The non-linear impact of state ownership on corporate risk-taking in Vietnamese listed firms


Authors

  • Nguyen Huu Truc Quy Nhon University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.57110/vnu-jeb.v5i4.339

Keywords:

Non-linear, risk-taking, state ownership, Vietnam

Abstract

This study aims to explore the non-linear impact of state ownership on corporate risk-taking in Vietnamese listed firms. Corporate risk-taking is determined by the volatility of stock returns, which includes total risk and idiosyncratic risk. The research data is collected from annual audited financial reports of 577 non-financial listed firms on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange and Hanoi Stock Exchange from 2007 to 2017. The regression outcomes, estimated by the dynamic system GMM estimator, significantly and consistently indicate that the impact of state ownership on corporate risk-taking is a U-shaped non-linearity. State ownership reduces corporate risk-taking behavior; but beyond a certain level of share held by the government, additional levels of state ownership lead to excessive hazardous activities. This article has contributed to the literature by adding empirical evidence on the non-linear impact of state ownership on corporate risk-taking in a typical emerging market. Some recommendations should be considered by state-owned firms, such as increasing the percentage of state ownership for firms operating in high-risk fields that aim for socio-economic development, whereas reducing state ownership for others to achieve profitability goals.

References

Aabo, T., Pantzalis, C., & Park, J. C. (2017). Idiosyncratic volatility- An indicator of noise trading. Journal of Banking & Finance, 75, 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.11.003

Adams, R. B., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. (2005). Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. Review of Financial Studies, 18(4), 1403–1432. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhi030

Akbar, S., Kharabsheh, B., Poletti-Hughes, J., & Ali Shah, S. H. (2017). Board structure and corporate risk-taking in the UK financial sector. International Review of Financial Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.02.001

Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., & Saffar, W. (2013). The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatization. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.12.007

Boycko, M., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1996). A theory of privatization. Economic Journal, 106, 309-319.

Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.10.006

Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00511

Dharwadkar, R., George, G., & Brandes, P. (2000). Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 650–669. https://doi.org/10.2307/259316

Dyck, A. (2001). Privatization and corporate governance: Principles, evidence, and future challenges. The World Bank Research Observer, 16, 59–84. https://ssrn.com/abstract=873694

accio, M., Marchica, M.-T., & Mura, R. (2011). Large shareholder diversification and corporate risk-taking. Review of Financial Studies, 24(11), 3601–3641. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr065

Fogel, K., Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2008). Big business stability and economic growth: Is what’s good for General Motors good for America? Journal of Financial Economics, 89, 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.06.004

Huang, Y. S., & Wang, C. J. (2014). Corporate governance and risk-taking of Chinese firms: The role of board size. International Review of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.11.016

Jiraporn, P., & Lee, S. M. (2017). How do independent directors influence corporate risk-taking? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. International Review of Finance. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2988769

John, K., Litov, L., & Yeung, B. (2008). Corporate governance and risk-taking. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1679–1728. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01372.x

Khaw, K. L., Liao, J., Tripe, D., & Wongchoti, U. (2016). Gender diversity, state control, and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 39, 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.06.002

Koerniadi, H., Krishnamurti, C., & Tourani-Rad, A. (2014). Corporate governance and risk-taking in New Zealand. Australasian Journal of Management, 39(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896213478332

Lassoued, N., Sassi, H., & Ben Rejeb Attia, M. (2016). The impact of state and foreign ownership on banking risk: Evidence from the MENA countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 36, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.09.014

Nakano, M., & Nguyen, P. (2012). Board size and corporate risk-taking: Further evidence from Japan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00924.x

Phung, D. N., & Mishra, A. V. (2015). Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnamese listed firms. Australian Economic Papers, 55(1), 63–98. http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-8454.12056

Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. (2000). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21(6), 689–705. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3094306

Uddin, H. (2015). Effect of government share ownership on corporate risk-taking: Case of the United Arab Emirates. Research in International Business and Finance, 34, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.09.033

Vickers, J., & Yarrow, G. (1991). Economic perspectives on privatization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.2.111

Vo, V. D., Tran, T. V. T., & Dang, T. P. N. (2020). The impact of ownership structure on listed firms’ performance in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 195–203. http://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.195

Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005

Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 196–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00752.x

Zhu, W., & Yang, J. (2016). State ownership, cross-border acquisition, and risk-taking: Evidence from China’s banking industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 71, 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.05.004

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

25-08-2025

Abstract View

56

PDF Downloaded

7

How to Cite

Nguyen Huu Truc. (2025). The non-linear impact of state ownership on corporate risk-taking in Vietnamese listed firms. VNU University of Economics and Business, 5(4), 26. https://doi.org/10.57110/vnu-jeb.v5i4.339

Issue

Section

Original Articles