The direct effect of ESG reporting on firm performance: Empirical evidence from global firms during the early years of the green and digital twin transition


Authors

  • Tran Thi Hien VNU University of Economics and Business
  • Pham Thi Song Hanh University of Leeds
DOI: https://doi.org/10.57110/vnu-jeb.v4i6.359

Keywords:

Twin transition, corporate social responsibility, CSR, ESG reporting, firm performance

Abstract

Whether the outcomes of the green and digital twin transition directly contributed to the firm’s financial performance (CFP) is a critical question. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data disclosed to the public in digital platforms demonstrates that the firms were in their digital and green twin transition. This study seeks to understand if the direct effect of ESG reporting on CFP is positive and differs between firms in more CSR-sensitive industries and firms in less CSR-sensitive industries that a firm is categorized into, during the early years of the green and digital twin transition. The study uses the 2SLS IV regression method for testing the hypotheses and a global-level dataset of 2,302 firm-year observations of 652 Fortune World’s Most Admired firms. The year between 2005 to 2011 was chosen to study as this is the early period that Bloomberg published ESG data in the Bloomberg data repository. The study finds that the ESG-CFP impact is significant and positive in the groups of industries highly sensitive to CSR but insignificant in the group of industries which is less sensitive to CSR. The paper offers managerial implications.

References

Abernathy, J., Stefaniak, C., Wilkins, A., & Olson, J. (2017). Literature review and research opportunities on the credibility of corporate social responsibility reporting. American Journal of Business, 32(1), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-04-2016-0013

Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022212816261

Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society, 41(3), 292-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650302041003003

Beck, C., Frost, G., & Jones, S. (2018). CSR disclosure and financial performance revisited: A cross-country analysis. Australian Journal of Management, 43(4), 517-537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896218771438

Bolton, R. N. & Drew, J. H. (1991). A longitudinal analysis of the impact of service changes on customer attitudes. Journal of Marketing, 55(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299105500101

Boyd, B. (1990). Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management Journal, 11(6), 419-430. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110602

Brooks, C., & Oikonomou, I. (2018). The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.11.005

Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102291

Chowdhury, R. H., Choi, S., Ennis, S. & Chung, D. (2019). Which dimension of corporate social responsibility is a value driver in the oil and gas industry? Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 36( 2), 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1492

Colombo, S., Guerci, M., & Miandar, T. (2019). What do unions and employers negotiate under the umbrella of corporate social responsibility? Comparative evidence from the Italian metal and chemical industries. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(2), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3503-9

Coraiola, D. M., & Derry, R. (2019). Remembering to forget: The historic irresponsibility of US big tobacco. Journal of Business Ethics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04323-4

Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P., & Wright, P. M. (2005). Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.15993158

Davidson, D. K. (2016). The importance of context in understanding CSR. In Örtenblad, A. (Ed.). (2016). Research Handbook on Corporate Social Responsibility in Context (pp. 32-45). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783474806.00011

Davis, S., & Albright, T. (2004). An investigation of the effect of balanced scorecard implementation on financial performance. Management Accounting Research, 15(2), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2003.11.001

De Roeck, K., El Akremi, A., & Swaen, V. (2016). Consistency matters! How and when does corporate social responsibility affect employees' organisational identification? Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1141-1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12216

Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximising business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x

Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organisational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239-263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235

Gopal, P., & Thakkar, J. (2016). Sustainable supply chain practices: An empirical investigation on Indian automobile industry. Production Planning & Control, 27(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2015.1060368

Henry, D. (2010). Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance compliance: A private contracting perspective. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 18(1), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2009.05.004

Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879

Homburg, C., Hoyer, W. D., & Koschate, N. (2005). Customers’ reactions to price increases: Do customer satisfaction and perceived motive fairness matter? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304269953

Kong, Y., Antwi-Adjei, A., & Bawuah, J. (2020). A systematic review of the business case for corporate social responsibility and firm performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1838

Le, T. V., & O'Brien, J. P. (2010). Can two wrongs make a right? State ownership and debt in a transition economy. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1297-1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00916.x

Lee, K.-H., & Shin, D. (2010). Consumers’ responses to CSR activities: The linkage between increased awareness and purchase intention. Public Relations Review, 36(2), 193-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.10.014

Lee, S., & Heo, C. Y. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and customer satisfaction among US publicly traded hotels and restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(4), 635-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.02.007

Leung, T. C. H., & Snell, R. S. (2017). Attraction or distraction? Corporate social responsibility in Macao’s gambling industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(3), 637-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2890-z

Li, L., Saat, M. M., Khatib, S. F., Chu, P., & Sulimany, H. G. H. (2024). Navigating the impact: A comprehensive analysis of ESG disclosure consequences through systematic review. Business Strategy & Development, 7(2), e382. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.382

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910

Peng, M. W. (2004). Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), 453-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.390

Pérez, A. (2015). Corporate reputation and ESG reporting to stakeholders: Gaps in the literature and future lines of research. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(1), 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-01-2014-0003

Ranängen, H., & Lindman, Å. (2018). Exploring corporate social responsibility practice versus stakeholder interests in Nordic mining. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 668-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.159

Rashid, A. (2015). Revisiting agency theory: Evidence of board independence and agency cost from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2211-y

Seetharaman, A., Swanson, Z. L., & Srinidhi, B. (2001). Analytical and empirical evidence of the impact of tax rates on the trade-off between debt and managerial ownership. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 16(3), 249-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0101600306

Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838

Sprinkle, G. B., & Maines, L. A. (2010). The benefits and costs of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 53(5), 445-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.05.006

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

Szymanski, D. M., & Henard, D. H. (2001). Customer satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(1), 16-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207030102900102

Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540-557. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4278989

Veugelers, R., Faivre, C., Rückert, D., & Weiss, C. (2023). The green and digital twin transition: EU vs US firms. Intereconomics, 58(1), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.2478/ie-2023-0010

Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business & Society, 55(8), 1083-1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315584317

Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Econometrics: A modern approach. South-Western.

Zhu, Y., Sun, L.-Y. & Leung, A. S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, firm reputation, and firm performance: The role of ethical leadership. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(4), 925-947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-013-9369-1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

25-12-2024

Abstract View

76

PDF Downloaded

5

How to Cite

Tran Thi Hien, & Pham Thi Song Hanh. (2024). The direct effect of ESG reporting on firm performance: Empirical evidence from global firms during the early years of the green and digital twin transition. VNU University of Economics and Business, 4(6), 1. https://doi.org/10.57110/vnu-jeb.v4i6.359

Issue

Section

Original Articles